References

[1]
D. J. Zea, D. Anfossi, M. Nielsen and C. Marino-Buslje. MIToS. jl: mutual information tools for protein sequence analysis in the Julia language. Bioinformatics 33, 564–565 (2017).
[2]
U. Hobohm, M. Scharf, R. Schneider and C. Sander. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Science 1, 409–417 (1992).
[3]
C. M. Buslje, J. Santos, J. M. Delfino and M. Nielsen. Correction for phylogeny, small number of observations and data redundancy improves the identification of coevolving amino acid pairs using mutual information. Bioinformatics 25, 1125–1131 (2009).
[4]
S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller and D. J. Lipman. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic acids research 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
[5]
S. D. Dunn, L. M. Wahl and G. B. Gloor. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics 24, 333–340 (2008).
[6]
P. Stothard. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 28, 1102–1104 (2000).
[7]
B. J. Grant, A. P. Rodrigues, K. M. ElSawy, J. A. McCammon and L. S. Caves. Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics 22, 2695–2696 (2006).
[8]
C. Marino Buslje, E. Teppa, T. Di Doménico, J. M. Delfino and M. Nielsen. Networks of high mutual information define the structural proximity of catalytic sites: implications for catalytic residue identification. PLoS computational biology 6, e1000978 (2010).